[Translated article] Immobilisation with compression bandage vs. antebraquial splint in distal radius fractures operated by open reduction and locking plate. Randomised clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, there is a lack of prospective studies to unify criteria about type and time for postoperative immobilisation in surgical distal radius fractures. The aim of this study is to compare functional and radiological results in two groups of distal radius fractures treated with internal fixation with locking plate, and immobilised with antebrachial splint or compression bandage for 3 weeks. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A randomised clinical trial was carried out with two parallel groups with 3, 6, and 12 weeks of follow-up. Main and secondary functional variables were measured, such as pain on VAS scale, values on PRWE, DASH and MRS scale, range of motion in flexion-extension, complications, etc. In addition, some radiological variables were measured at preoperative period and one week after surgery, such as union time, dorsal displacement, shortening, ulnar variance, etc. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were evaluated: 27 immobilised with bandage and 35 with splint. Analysis of the results obtained showed significant differences in both groups for almost all radiological variables from pre to postoperative period, and for all functional variables from 3 to 12 weeks after surgery. No significant differences were found between the two groups for any of the radiological and functional variables evaluated (VAS 3-12 weeks: p=.584; PWRE 3-12 weeks: p=.248; flexion range of motion 3-12 weeks: p=.959; extension range of motion: p=.50; union time: p=.89). CONCLUSIONS: We do not find clinical or radiological differences between immobilisation with antebrachial splint or compression bandage for distal radius fractures operated with locking plate. A greater number of patients and follow-up are necessary to extrapolate the results to the general population and to establish criteria for good postoperative management of these fractures.

Immobilization with compression bandage vs antebraquial splint in distal radius fractures operated by open reduction and locking plate. Randomized clinical trial. / Inmovilización con vendaje compresivo vs férula antebraquial en fracturas de radio distal intervenidas mediante reducción abierta y placa bloqueada. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, there is a lack of prospective studies to unify criteria about type and time for postoperative immobilization in surgical distal radius fractures. The aim of this study is to compare functional and radiological results in two groups of distal radius fractures treated with internal fixation with locking plate, and immobilized with antebrachial splint or compression bandage for 3weeks. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A randomized clinical trial was carried out with two parallel groups with 3, 6, and 12weeks of follow-up. Main and secondary functional variables were measured, such as pain on VAS scale, values on PRWE, DASH and MRS scale, range of motion in flexion-extension, complications, etc. In addition, some radiological variables were measured at preoperative period and one week after surgery, such as union time, dorsal displacement, shortening, ulnar variance, etc. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were evaluated: 27 immobilized with bandage and 35 with splint. Analysis of the results obtained showed significant differences in both groups for almost all radiological variables from pre to postoperative period, and for all functional variables from 3 to 12weeks after surgery. No significant differences were found between the two groups for any of the radiological and functional variables evaluated (VAS 3-12weeks: P=.584; PWRE 3-12weeks: P=.248; flexion range of motion 3-12weeks: P=.959; extension range of motion: P=.50; union time: P=.89). CONCLUSIONS: We do not find clinical or radiological differences between immobilization with antebrachial splint or compression bandage for distal radius fractures operated with locking plate. A greater number of patients and follow-up are necessary to extrapolate the results to the general population and to establish criteria for good postoperative management of these fractures.